Page 25 - BOSS Today Issue 14
P. 25

LEGAL
                                                                                          leGal
                                                                                           FaCt



                                                                                    it is a criminal offence to fail to
                                                                                 give written details of a redundancy
                                                                                calculation. Both the company and its
                                                                                     officers can be fined up to
                                                                                   £200 per conviction. this only
                                                                                applies to the statutory redundancy
                                                                                  payments – any contractual
                                                                                        enhancements
                                                                                         are exempt.


       ’Consultant’ Can still mean
       ‘employee’











       A case involving liquidation shows why you need to take care over job titles



          t is always worth       to consider a claim for unfair
          remembering that someone   dismissal and accrued holiday,
       iwho is considered self-   on the ground that it had no
       employed for tax purposes may   jurisdiction to hear the case.
       still be considered an employee   The EAT overturned this
       under employment law.      decision. It considered that in
         Take the case of Dr Freedman.   focusing on the share transfer,
       He operated a business as a sole   the ET had failed to take into
       trader, and in 2009 incorporated   account the transfer of assets and
       it as Career Energy Ltd (CEL). A   contracts, and had been wrong
       new company, Career Energy   to decide that there had been
       Consultancy Services Ltd (CECSL),   no transfer of his employment.
       was formed and 52 per cent of its   It added that when Freedman
       shares were sold to an investor.   became a consultant he had in
       As part of the overall transaction,   fact continued to be an employee
       CEL was put into liquidation   regardless of the label put on the
       and its employees, assets and   relationship by the parties.
       contracts were transferred to   The EAT therefore considered
       CECSL. Freedman then continued   that the ET did have jurisdiction
       to act as chief executive until   to hear Freedman’s claims, and
       February 2010, when the investor   referred the case to a new tribunal.
       who controlled the majority   One lesson to be learned from
       shareholding took over his   this case is that while a pure share
       role. Freedman continued as a   sale does not fall within TUPE, a
       director and carried out the same   more complex transaction can
       duties, but he was described as   include both a share sale and
       a consultant and was paid salary   a transfer of business. Another
       and commissions gross against   is that the parties may label a
       invoices submitted. In October   working relationship as one thing,
       2010, CECSL went into insolvent   and HMRC may accept this, but an
       liquidation.               employment tribunal can take an
         An ET found that there had   entirely different view.
       been no transfer of Freedman’s
       employment in 2009, that he   n For more inFormation,
       had ceased to be an employee in   contact your BoSS Hr
       February 2010, and so declined   adviSer on 0845 450 1565.


       32  BOSS TODAY | May/June 2012
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27